MROTD 12.22.19
- syke36
- Dec 22, 2019
- 3 min read
Updated: May 25, 2020

I made the point earlier that the greatest protection you can offer girls (and boys) against "sex trafficking" is having them raised in the home with their biological father. Ideally, their mother would be in the same home and they would ALL share the exact same last name. There's a lot to unpack in those last two sentences as you start testing your favorite soy boys to find exceptions to the basic rule I just gave you.
Go tap the shoulder of the closest freakshow you know and see if you can check off all the criteria with regard to his or her upbringing. You'll fail most of the time. I know correlation isn't causation, but ummm…I'm going to go ahead and say causation here.
There has been such a degradation of masculinity and fatherhood that all the protections it provided for children are quickly disappearing if not already gone. And this is what you end up with: A man raised by an illiterate single mother who marries an anti black male feminist(Is there any other kind?). You end up with pants-sagging neanderthugs or fruitcakes like the boy in the photo.
Now let me break down my last comment because I know many of you were raised without your fathers and only have your overly emotional single mother/feminist mentality to rely on which means you have nothing. I am not talking about his so-called sexuality. In fact, that should never be a topic of conversation at his age. Ever! His reckless parents are turning him into a fruitcake by pushing a homosexual and feminist agenda on him at an early age. There is no way sexuality should be a part of his early upbringing. What do I know right? I'm unenlightened, right? You should be talking about sex with your children from the time they are a toddler, right? You should be preaching gay acceptance and gender fluidity from the time they are learning their ABC's, right?
A is for anal
B is for Bisexual
C is for Consent
They're children, not sexual beings. Their sexual identity will develop over time. They don't need your foot or finger up their ass, you fucking pervert. You answer the questions they ask honestly and with correct terminology. As they mature, they will come into their own identity without any prodding from you. So quit branding your children with rainbow flag face tattoos or getting them tongue piercings or telling boys they should sit down like mama when they pee. But maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. Go ahead and groom them to be sexual beings capable of sexual agency from the time they are in pull-ups. I wonder if all that priming makes it easier or harder for the predators and traffickers. If there's nothing wrong with a 10 year old coming out as gay, what would be wrong with him expressing his new found sexuality with someone else? And what's the problem if that someone else is a transgender and transage individual? Are you starting to see how stupid you are now? You do not push sex or sexuality on children! In fact, when children have an advanced knowledge of sex and sexuality at a young age, it's a huge red flag that (sexual) abuse has occured.
The bottom line is you are supposed to parent them, not proselytize or pimp them. Stop pushing the alphabet mafia's agenda and let them be children. Children are naturally curious. They will ask questions. You can answer them without trying to brainwash them. I need you to be better than you were raised.
Comentários